Maybe it's just me, but if you can't see another vehicle in broad daylight without it's lights being on, what are you doing operating a motor vehicle in the first place? And here all of these years I was under the impression that one had to have 20-20 vision, or vision corrected to at least 20-40, to get a drivers license. Silly me.
Sounds to me like another case of "I'm from the government and I'm here to help you". Thanks, but I don't recall asking them for help. :whatever:
A few observations...
I read a report recently that concluded that daytime running lights actually decrease the fuel efficiency of a vehicle. Granted, it's not by a large amount, but any system that adds an additional burden to the electrical system of a vehicle causes more drag on the engine.
On my way home from work recently I witnessed the aftermath of an accident at a busy intersection. The driver of one car had run the red light and hit another car. Both cars were equipped with - you guessed it - daytime running lights. Apparently, the daytime running lights did nothing to make the driver at fault a better or safer driver. Nor did they afford the victim of the crash anything of use to prevent the accident from occuring. And isn't this the real issue here...creating responsible drivers instead of dancing around the issue by creating superfluous, "safety" remedies to prevent accidents?
I don't want to sound reactionary here, but there's usually some financial benefit to some party somewhere in a story like this. I wonder if GE or Sylvania had anything to do with daytime running lights? Running the headlights continuously, even at lower power, has got to cause some premature headlight burnout. Follow the money trail?
Maybe it is just me...
