• You're one step from joining Guitar Discussion Forum - The Fret.
    Create a free account to post, follow threads, and never miss an update.  Sign up free →

Guess what I'm building....

Guitar Discussion Forum - The Fret

Help Support TheFret.net:

Looks very exciting. I may have missed something but what type of amp will it be? I really only have Fender or Marshall as reference points. Will it be a head or a combo?
I guess this is what they refer to as "point to point" wiring?
After having a couple of situations arise lately where some soldering experince would come in handy I feel I should look into a decent iron kit.
 
Are all your resistors Carbon Comp?
Most, but not all. There are a couple of metal oxides and ceramic wire-wounds in the high DC voltage portions of the circuit, one metal film across a couple of the pins of V2, and the four 68K input resistors are carbon films. But the rest of the resistors in the signal path are all carbon composite. I assume they were chosen for "historical accuracy" to the original Marshall 18W circuit. Personally, I would have chosen metal film for their tighter tolerance and reduced thermal noise, but then there's a whole crowd who extol the "warmth & mojo" of carbon comps and deride the "sterility & lack of character" of metal films. Personally, I think it's BS, but "opinions vary", as they say....

I may have missed something but what type of amp will it be? Will it be a head or a combo? I guess this is what they refer to as "point to point" wiring?
It's a Marshall 18W clone, and will be a head. Two channels, Normal and TMB (treble-mid-bass), with one high and one low input jack on each channel. I bought the kit in December 2009 (yeah, you read that right....) from Trinity Amps in Ontario and finally got around to building it. Yes, this is point-to-point wiring, using a turret board.
 
Yeah, the most plausible thing I can figure from reading the intarweb is that carbon comps can distort in the 2nd harmonic when there's a high voltage across them (which may be construed by some as "warmth or mojo"). So, in the signal path with high voltage (plate resistors) would be a good spot.
 
but then there's a whole crowd who extol the "warmth & mojo" of carbon comps and deride the "sterility & lack of character" of metal films. Personally, I think it's BS, but "opinions vary", as they say....

Silly cork sniffers
SuperStock_1773R-3330.jpg
 
...... Personally, I would have chosen metal film for their tighter tolerance and reduced thermal noise, but then there's a whole crowd who extol the "warmth & mojo" of carbon comps and deride the "sterility & lack of character" of metal films. Personally, I think it's BS, but "opinions vary", as they say....

Why not meet half way and use Carbon Film ;) Given the propensity for variation in sound between different tubes, I'd not be losing too much sleep over the choice of resistors, and I'm quite sure you aren't either :)

(I ordered Carbon Films for mine. We'll see how they go when they arrive)

Looking good though DVM! What kind of speaker cab are you planning on running it into?
 
But the rest of the resistors in the signal path are all carbon composite. I assume they were chosen for "historical accuracy" to the original Marshall 18W circuit. Personally, I would have chosen metal film for their tighter tolerance and reduced thermal noise, but then there's a whole crowd who extol the "warmth & mojo" of carbon comps and deride the "sterility & lack of character" of metal films. Personally, I think it's BS, but "opinions vary", as they say....

This quest for 'historical accuracy' in amps brought to mind a quote from Randall Smith, founder/designer at Mesa Engineering.

http://www.mesaboogie.com/Reviews/guitarist-F-50/Designing_f-50.htm
But as I came up 30 years ago, I wanted to take what I had been repairing for years and try to kick it up to another level and satisfy the wishes I kept hearing from the players I knew. They weren’t all that stoked with what we would now consider vintage treasures. They saw sonic limitations and they wanted more from their amps. That quest led to ...
 
DONE!! Finished it up last night. Fired up perfectly first time. Sounds great--LOUD!! More on that later, but here are the latest batch of photos (don't have final lead dress done w/ wire ties, so don't gig me on that!):

18W_controls+input_wiring.jpg


18W_full_gut.jpg


18W_top_front.jpg


18W_top_back.jpg
 
Well done. That looks so nice. What I find so amazing is that such a simple circuit made from discrete components can do so much and produce such art. Bravo! :dude
 
Wow !! that's a beauty ..You finaly did it DVM.. Great job as usual ..I m sure you will love it ..

Congrats ..

Obviously an audio Clip is a must !!
 
Last couple of photos--mounted in the head cabinet, which I also bought from Trinity. Was in a blond mood that day:

18W_cab_front.jpg


18W_cab_back.jpg
 
I think the question that is on everyone's mind is: Will it give me screaming solos?
 
I think the question that is on everyone's mind is: Will it give me screaming solos?
This amph will most definitely give you screaming solos. Particularly on the high input to the TMB channel, with the gain cranked up around 8.

I will try to post a clip. Hopefully, it will take me somewhat less time to do so than it did to get started on this amp....er, amph.
 
Considering the length of the build time, could this now technically qualify as a "vintage" amp . . . ?? :poke

Seriously nice build there, DVM - just as I'd expect. Cheers.
 
Considering the length of the build time, could this now technically qualify as a "vintage" amp . . . ?? :poke

Seriously nice build there, DVM - just as I'd expect. Cheers.

Well, DVM himself qualifies as "vintage" so . . . *ducks*

Good to hear from you again, Nelskie!
 
Considering the length of the build time, could this now technically qualify as a "vintage" amp . . . ??
Well, DVM himself qualifies as "vintage" so . . .

To both comments, I respond with the words of former Vice-President Spiro T. Agnew: "Nolo contendere"

Good to see you here, Jon!
 
If you don't mind me asking what tubes did you use. The recommended " The Tube Store" on the Trinity Web site is just down the road from me. I have bought several tubes from the. I am one of the few people who have used there walk up sales desk.
 
If you don't mind me asking what tubes did you use. The recommended " The Tube Store" on the Trinity Web site is just down the road from me. I have bought several tubes from the. I am one of the few people who have used there walk up sales desk.
The EZ81 rectifier came from our own Tunghaichuan (tip-o-the-hat....a very generous guy!), but the rest are JJ's from Eurotubes.com. Bob & the gang do a great job over there--super service and excellent pricing. And I've had good luck with JJ tubes.
 
UPDATE 2/29/12:

To tame the output volume while maintaining the nice Marshall crunch, I bought a voltage reduction module (VRM) kit from Trinity Amps and installed it. These units install on the DC rail of the amp and let you drop the DC voltage while the AC filament heater voltage remains unaffected. They have the reputation of doing a great job of reducing the output volume without a significant amount of tone loss, which is a common complaint with external attenuators. For a cathode-biased amp like this 18W, it's a very straightforward installation, and it works exactly as advertised. I can dial down the DC voltage enough to run the preamp gain up all the way and the master volume high enough to get some nice power tube saturation, and still keep the volume to a non-lethal level! Pretty slick little modification!

Couple of photos below. The VRM consists of a MOSFET mounted against the chassis (with an insulator pad in between) to facilitate heat dissipation, a small PCB with a handful of components, and a 1M pot to control the DC voltage output. It's wired in between the standby switch and the first filter cap, and I have the control pot mounted through the back of the chassis, between the mains connector and the output impedance selector switch. The Trinity kit also came with a couple of DC blocking caps for the inputs to the first preamp tube, in case you find that the volume pot(s) on your guitar pick up some scratchiness. This can happen due to a very small amount of low voltage DC current getting back to the guitar controls through the input jacks when the voltage is cranked way down, but I haven't had to install those on mine.

18W_gut+VRM.jpg


18W_VRM.jpg
 
Nice one. Am I right in thinking this amp doesn't have a master volume hence the need for the VRM? I considered a similar approach for my JTM45 project, but instead went for a Lar/Mar style MV setup. Hopefully that works!
 
Am I right in thinking this amp doesn't have a master volume hence the need for the VRM?
Yes and no. The Normal (low gain) channel is non-master volume, but the TMB (high gain) channel has Gain (preamp) and Master Volume controls. The problem is that it's one of those MV controls where it goes from silent to ear-bleeding loud between 0 and 2. So the VRM actually lets me dial the MV control up far enough to get some power tube saturation before it's so loud that my brains start leaking out of the holes in my head....
 
Back
Top