Beautiful, certainly (well, maybe except the pickguard, I could live without that, but then again that's minor and easily replaced).
But then we come to what's really important: the sound and the craftsmanship, in that particular order. I don't mean to burst anyone's bubble, but it looks to me like Gibson is trying to shove second-class guitars on the market and sell them before anyone notices any quality issues.
I'm in the market for a good Les Paul Junior myself, and the price is right, especially considering the somewhat-nitrocellulose laquer satin finish and the real P90 (as opposed to the BJA H90 hum-cancelling tricks) - but then I hear that the body is not all mahogany (most sites list "maple top", "maple cap", and so on), and
this guy claims it's way lighter than the Les Pauls he has (and he sounds like he knows a thing or two about guitars). I can't find any actual reviews on any online vendor's website I've looked for more information on (and I've looked everywhere I could think of).
Plus, Gibson are masters of not telling the whole story on their guitar specs pages. I've emailed them a couple of days ago asking for more details about the type of wood, finish, etc., but so far no reply. If this keeps up, I think I'd rather wait some more, save some money, sell some of the other guitars I own and either get a Custom Shop 5X-reissue, or an Epiphone if it's Epiphone quality I'll get anyway.
I'm waiting for the day when guitar companies actually start posting clips on their websites, for each pickup through 20 types of amps for each guitar, so we can buy using our ears instead of our eyes.
Just my 2 cents.