marnold
Reverend Rawk
- Joined
- Oct 15, 2005
- Messages
- 7,152
- Reaction score
- 25
Well, my Lions hold the #1 pick and at this point their choices seem to be Georgia QB Matt Stafford, Baylor OT Jason Smith, Virginia OT Eugene Monroe, or Wake Forest LB Aaron Curry. I think Andre Smith is pretty much entirely out of the picture having shown up to the combine overweight and then leaving early without telling anybody. Too many red flags. I guess it would figure that the Lions would have the #1 pick in a year where there is no clear #1.
Matt Stafford
The case for: The Lions have no quarterback--the most important position in football. They haven't had an all-pro at that position since Greg Landry in 1971. He's got a cannon for an arm--you can't teach that. He was in a pro-style offense at Georgia and got the most out of not a lot of other talent on that team. He could sit for a year behind Culpepper before being thrown to the wolves. Hey, he went to the same high school as Bobby Layne!
The case against: He can be inaccurate. Most pundits don't feel that he warrants the #1 overall pick.
Jason Smith or Eugene Monroe
The case for: Obviously the Lions need help in the trenches. An OT would be easier to sign than a QB.
The case against: If you're going to spend that kind of dough on an OT, he'd better be the second coming of Jonathan Ogden. They'd also have to move Jeff Backus to guard, but that certainly would not be the end of the world. Baylor (not sure about Virginia) ran a spread offense so there would be a question about adjustment to the pros, especially with run blocking--something the Lions desperately need.
Aaron Curry
The case for: The Lions have one LB worth writing home about (Ernie Sims). Curry would probably the easiest and the cheapest to sign. There's no denying his skill set.
The case against: Do you want to spend the #1 pick on a LB when the LB class is deep?
I have no idea which way the Lions will go. My personal feeling is that if you think that Stafford is all that, draft him. The Lions have five quarterbacks: Culpepper, Kitna, Orlovsky, Stanton, and Henson. If you combined their skill sets you might have a decent QB. None of those guys are ones you can build around. Ideally, they'd trade down, but with no consensus #1, who's going to want to pay the price to move up?
There is an argument that the Lions should wait until next year to get a QB since they will likely have a high pick again and Oklahoma's Sam Bradford, Texas' Colt McCoy and Florida's Tim Tebow will be coming out. The problem there is that all three of them run the spread instead of pro-style offenses. The jury is out on how Tebow will do in the pros--is he even a QB prospect? Bradford and McCoy put up gaudy numbers but nobody plays a lick of defense in the Big 12. Matt Cassel is out there too and the Lions have cap room, but I have difficulty believing that he is worth the cash that he'll have to be paid. Plus playing with a very good Patriots team is much different from playing with a crappy Lions team.
No matter what happens, the likelihood of disaster remains high.
Matt Stafford
The case for: The Lions have no quarterback--the most important position in football. They haven't had an all-pro at that position since Greg Landry in 1971. He's got a cannon for an arm--you can't teach that. He was in a pro-style offense at Georgia and got the most out of not a lot of other talent on that team. He could sit for a year behind Culpepper before being thrown to the wolves. Hey, he went to the same high school as Bobby Layne!
The case against: He can be inaccurate. Most pundits don't feel that he warrants the #1 overall pick.
Jason Smith or Eugene Monroe
The case for: Obviously the Lions need help in the trenches. An OT would be easier to sign than a QB.
The case against: If you're going to spend that kind of dough on an OT, he'd better be the second coming of Jonathan Ogden. They'd also have to move Jeff Backus to guard, but that certainly would not be the end of the world. Baylor (not sure about Virginia) ran a spread offense so there would be a question about adjustment to the pros, especially with run blocking--something the Lions desperately need.
Aaron Curry
The case for: The Lions have one LB worth writing home about (Ernie Sims). Curry would probably the easiest and the cheapest to sign. There's no denying his skill set.
The case against: Do you want to spend the #1 pick on a LB when the LB class is deep?
I have no idea which way the Lions will go. My personal feeling is that if you think that Stafford is all that, draft him. The Lions have five quarterbacks: Culpepper, Kitna, Orlovsky, Stanton, and Henson. If you combined their skill sets you might have a decent QB. None of those guys are ones you can build around. Ideally, they'd trade down, but with no consensus #1, who's going to want to pay the price to move up?
There is an argument that the Lions should wait until next year to get a QB since they will likely have a high pick again and Oklahoma's Sam Bradford, Texas' Colt McCoy and Florida's Tim Tebow will be coming out. The problem there is that all three of them run the spread instead of pro-style offenses. The jury is out on how Tebow will do in the pros--is he even a QB prospect? Bradford and McCoy put up gaudy numbers but nobody plays a lick of defense in the Big 12. Matt Cassel is out there too and the Lions have cap room, but I have difficulty believing that he is worth the cash that he'll have to be paid. Plus playing with a very good Patriots team is much different from playing with a crappy Lions team.
No matter what happens, the likelihood of disaster remains high.