War is a bit more complex
That two songs are "about war" doesn't mean they should sound in any way alike. As for the two specific songs, one is about war, as far as why do we have it and why can't it be peace, the other about the actual experience of being in a war live right then and there. one is conceptual while one is experiential.
as for my question, it wasn't why do think the song should sound smooth, but why do you expect an actual machine gun, the weapon not the song, to sound smooth? they don't and this was the sound he both sought for and achieved on this song. it's not supposed to be pretty, or smooth or necesaarily "fun" to listen to. it's supposed to be a musical intepretation about what it's like to be in a firefight with a mahcine gun in your hand and all around you. again, not a pleasant experience so not a "pleasant" song. do songs have to be pleasant? can't we expect more than one flavor from a war-related song? i am curious, do you think it "sounds like crap" after the intro bc it gets harsh or because you just don't think it's any good? bc it sure seems like the former, which, as you can see makes no sense to me.
and yes, i am a huge hendrix fan, and if i wasn't clear enough earlier when i stated it outright, YES this is both my favorite and my vote for his best song for all the reasons i have given and so many many more.
lastly, i never in a million years thought i'd be comparing and contrasting machine gun with a song by the firm, who, IMHO sucked.