• You're one step from joining Guitar Discussion Forum - The Fret.
    Create a free account to post, follow threads, and never miss an update.  Sign up free →

What Amp?

Guitar Discussion Forum - The Fret

Help Support TheFret.net:

Got to second Jipes' vote for the Laney LC15. Played one and it's brilliant, but a little too expensive for me.

Other than that and the Valve Jr, I'd say either an Orange Tiny Terror, Blackstar HT-5 or Blackstar Artisan 15. Not exactly cheap but I've heard them all and they sound incredible. The Blackstars in particular were the best I heard at one of the guitar shows a while ago...better than the Marshalls.
 
You should ask those girls where you work to buy you a Fender Super Champ XD!:rotflmao: :rotflmao:
 
just strum said:
I just noticed that the Blackheart is made by Crate. The way Crate takes a beating here and other forums, I am surprised it's rated as well as you guys say it is. It doesn't take anything away from it and it is giving me a little GAS build-up.

That threw me when I first got mine, but the build quality is pretty good overall. The chassis is nice and thick, the head cab is plywood, I believe and is well made. The transformers look nice as well.

It comes stock with cheesy Chinese tubes, but to be honest, they don't sound bad.

The build quality is better than the Valve Junior, which seems slightly flimsier in comparison. Thinner chassis, the head cab isn't finished nearly as nice. The OT is smaller in the VJ as well.

tung
 
just strum said:
I just noticed that the Blackheart is made by Crate. The way Crate takes a beating here and other forums, I am surprised it's rated as well as you guys say it is. It doesn't take anything away from it and it is giving me a little GAS build-up.

Spud and I were just discussing this (his Blackheart) off forum and he was mentioning that the Crate Powerblock is also really good. So that is interesting. All I can say is I liked the sound of his Little Giant head into that cabinet he has. A whole lot of people here know a whole lot more than I do. I just like what I heard.
 
The Crate V5 is also well built (i'm not adding this one up to the list, just pointing out that it's very well built... soundwise? that's another story).
It's all thick plywood (not particle board), sturdy chasis, tolex placed perfectly and as the Tone King claims on his website: it's a plus to be painted black on the inside if you're thinking of using it as an open-back cab.
 
IIRC, the Blackheart amphs were designed by the same guy who designed the Valve Jr. So they are produced by Crate but were designed by somebody else. For whatever that's worth.
 
marnold said:
IIRC, the Blackheart amphs were designed by the same guy who designed the Valve Jr. So they are produced by Crate but were designed by somebody else. For whatever that's worth.

So a bit like those "Duncan Designed" pickups.
 
marnold said:
IIRC, the Blackheart amphs were designed by the same guy who designed the Valve Jr. So they are produced by Crate but were designed by somebody else. For whatever that's worth.


Pytor Belov, I think?
But pay attention to Tung's observations about the PCB traces and build quality........you can invent the world's greatest P,B, & J, and use stale bread and it still tastes yukky!:confused:
FWIW, Pytor also designed the So-Cal 50w head (which I love dearly), but it's really hard to find them now.........they may have quit production on them, go figure.........:thwap:
 
oldguy said:
Pytor Belov, I think?
But pay attention to Tung's observations about the PCB traces and build quality........you can invent the world's greatest P,B, & J, and use stale bread and it still tastes yukky!:confused:

Let me qualify my statement: the build quality is pretty good. The board and traces are sturdy enough if left alone. I wouldn't buy one with the intention of modding a Blackheart by working on the PCB, though. The PCB is not ideal for modding. When I mod mine, I'm going to rip out the PCB and either do a point to point scheme or buy a replacement turret board.

oldguy said:
FWIW, Pytor also designed the So-Cal 50w head (which I love dearly), but it's really hard to find them now.........they may have quit production on them, go figure.........:thwap:

Too bad, seems like a good amp. Probably too much power for a bedroom player though, which is why the little 5W amps have taken off in the last couple of years.

tung
 
You're probably right, Tung, 50w is overkill for most at-home players.
BTW, we appreciate your observations on build quality and how it evolves in these amphs, and the strengths and weaknesses of each.
And to clarify my statement....... when I refer to your observations on the build quality, I was including your earlier statements about the Valve Jr. also, and the ver. 1, 2, and 3. and not just the Blackheart. My point being Belov might have designed all these amphs, but there are differences in them for whatever reasons, as far as quality of components.
e.g.....
When I did the "gold" mods to my ver. 2 Valve Jr. head, it was my first time at modding, so I took my sweet time, consulting the old 18w forum daily, doing one thing at a time, checking the results 'till I was done.
It turned out fine, but I could've really messed up the PC board if not for the warnings posted by others concerning soldering on the thing.
So, when you give us a heads up on changes (like the PCB''s) it really helps.
And for that, I thank you!:bravo:
 
oldguy said:
You're probably right, Tung, 50w is overkill for most at-home players.

Back in the 90s I had a collection of Sundown amps, including two 100W Rebel heads. I'm at best a bedroom player, what am I going to do with 200 watts of power? I ended up liquidating them.

Having said that, I wouldn't mind having one of those SoCal heads. :dude:

oldguy said:
BTW, we appreciate your observations on build quality and how it evolves in these amphs, and the strengths and weaknesses of each.
And to clarify my statement....... when I refer to your observations on the build quality, I was including your earlier statements about the Valve Jr. also, and the ver. 1, 2, and 3. and not just the Blackheart. My point being Belov might have designed all these amphs, but there are differences in them for whatever reasons, as far as quality of components.

Versions 1 & 2 of the VJ were marginal at best. Not bad amps, just typical, average (read:substandard) Chinese build quality. Those PCBs did suck big time. I ended up damaging the traces on two different boards and I have decent soldering equipment and am fairly good at soldering.

oldguy said:
e.g.....
When I did the "gold" mods to my ver. 2 Valve Jr. head, it was my first time at modding, so I took my sweet time, consulting the old 18w forum daily, doing one thing at a time, checking the results 'till I was done.
It turned out fine, but I could've really messed up the PC board if not for the warnings posted by others concerning soldering on the thing.

Epiphone, to their credit, apparently listened to all the modding being discussed on the various boards and did improve the quality of their latest Ver. 3 amps. Those boards are way better quality.

oldguy said:
So, when you give us a heads up on changes (like the PCB''s) it really helps.
And for that, I thank you!:bravo:

Cool, I am glad I can be helpful in some small way. One of the things that really irks me about music gear is shoddy construction. I've owned enough crappy equipment. I hate it when it breaks down prematurely.

To get back on topic for Strum: the BH Little Giant combo is pretty good. I'd also look at the 15W Handsome Devil combo. The Fender Blues Junior might be a good choice. Another way to go would be a replica of a Fender 5E3. Different tonality with the 6V6 tubes vs. the EL84s in the BH amps and the aforementioned Fender. Lots of choices out there, Strum.

tung
 
tunghaichuan said:
Epiphone, to their credit, apparently listened to all the modding being discussed on the various boards and did improve the quality of their latest Ver. 3 amps. Those boards are way better quality.
hey tung....how can you tell if it is a version 3 head....there have been a couple on craigslist recently but i think i would want the version 3 only....thanks....
 
warren0728 said:
hey tung....how can you tell if it is a version 3 head....there have been a couple on craigslist recently but i think i would want the version 3 only....thanks....

The on/off switch will be blank and it will have a 16-digit serial # if it is a version 3. The version 2 amps had a white "I" and "0" on the on off switch and an 8-digit serial #.

tung
 
tunghaichuan said:
The on/off switch will be blank and it will have a 16-digit serial # if it is a version 3. The version 2 amps had a white "I" and "0" on the on off switch and an 8-digit serial #.

tung
are the version 2 amps that much more inferior to the version 3?
 
Strum & Warren:

IMHO, the stock version 2 VJ is inferior to the stock version 3 VJ. The OT is the wrong impedance (7.5K vs 5.2k), there are some odd resistor values in V2 which were improved in V3. To me, the stock V3 sounds much better. For non-modding purposes, I would get the V3.

For modding, it is a toss up but I give the edge to the V3 as you don't have to do much to get it sounding really good. With V2 it is almost necessary to change out the OT for a better one, it sounds really bad. The PCB is much better in the V3 and will hold up much better to parts changes.

One advantage that the V2 has is that there is a 12-0-12v winding on the PT. The PT in V2 was used in another Epiphone amp which had opamps. The 12-0-12v winding was used for the opamp power supply. I was able to build a fixed bias supply out of this winding. It was an interesting experiment, but I couldn't detect a difference in tone, so I switched the amp back to cathode bias. V3 lacks this winding on the PT.

OTOH if you want to do a complete gut and rebuild (replace PCB & OT), get a V2 if it is cheaper.

My $.02

tung
 
sunvalleylaw said:
A whole lot of people here know a whole lot more than I do. I just like what I heard.



+1000 This is probably the wisest thing I have heard anyone say around any forum I belong to in years.

When it comes down to a question like this that is entirely too subjective (meaning open to an individuals own likes and dislikes) What YOU like and sounds good to YOU will always win out over someone else's opinion.
 
Kazz said:
+1000 This is probably the wisest thing I have heard anyone say around any forum I belong to in years.

When it comes down to a question like this that is entirely too subjective (meaning open to an individuals own likes and dislikes) What YOU like and sounds good to YOU will always win out over someone else's opinion.

Apparently you need to read the opening post before you make a statement that it is "too subjective".

This is exactly what I was looking for. I wanted feedback from people with actual experience with amps that are good performers in small rooms.
 
there are so many amps choices these days it's impossible to pin down even half a dozen that will fit any need.There are more amps today than in the entire history of music

not too many years ago, there were only a few brands/ amps for any given purpose. now new amps/brands pop up daily.

It's impossible anymore to pin down an answer to. whats the best amp for _____ ?

only the player can decide, suggestions will get you in the ballpark at best.
the thread could go on forever.:confused:
 
Andy said:
there are so many amps choices these days it's impossible to pin down even half a dozen that will fit any need.There are more amps today than in the entire history of music

not too many years ago, there were only a few brands/ amps for any given purpose. now new amps/brands pop up daily.

It's impossible anymore to pin down an answer to. whats the best amp for _____ ?

only the player can decide, suggestions will get you in the ballpark at best.
the thread could go on forever.:confused:


Andy, again this thread didn't ask for the best amp, it simply asked for peoples experience with amps they have owned or heard.

It simply is a thread with mini reviews of amps that fit the criteria of what was described in the first post.
 
Sorry , my bad .I went back and reread your posting.

I have a valve jr that I really like, it's a modded v.3.
however at 5w it's quite loud when the tubes are singing.
It's going thru an epi 1 x 12 cab, I love that lady luck speaker.

I'm tempted to buy a so-cal 4 x 12 just to rob the speakers.
 
Andy said:
Sorry , my bad .I went back and reread your posting.

I have a valve jr that I really like, it's a modded v.3.
however at 5w it's quite loud when the tubes are singing.
It's going thru an epi 1 x 12 cab, I love that lady luck speaker.

I'm tempted to buy a so-cal 4 x 12 just to rob the speakers.

No need to be sorry. I opened the thread the way I did because I wanted people to give first hand experience and a general guide to what is out there.

I certainly was well aware of the "what are the best strings" syndrome:D
 
Way late to the party here, but I'd have to put in a vote for the Egnater Rebel 20 watt head. With the power scaling feature going from 1 watt to 20, with the "bright" and "tight" switches, it is one versatile amph. The ability to blend 6v6 and EL84 tube levels is another great feature. I got tones from "ice pick in the ear" shrill to dark and thick tones on an American Telecaster. The cleans are chimey (I put that in there just for you, Andy! :poke: :D ), and the dirty sounds are good, too.

My criteria for a small practice room would be these:

1. The amph must be small, and not take up a ton of room.
2. The amph must be portable, because the space may be used temporarily for something else.
3. The amph must be capable of screamin solos at reasonable levels.
4. The amph must be affordable.
5. The amph must be capable of a bunch of different tones, since, by definition a "small" practice room doesn't have the space to house a bunch of different amphs.

IMO, any of the small 5 watter amphs out there would fit the bill. I just like the Egnater because it packs a lot of power in a convenient and small package.
 
Back
Top