Python brings up some good points here:
piebaldpython said:
OK Strum........here ya go.......take what I say with a grain of salt because I'm not a player, not an amp tech.....that being said.......per your question of being "bedroom" amp.
Well, that puts you way ahead of me, I'm not even a player. I'm just a hacker who has experimented with tube circuits enough to know a little bit.
piebaldpython said:
My question.....is an attentuator better than pentode/triode switching? Which gives better "true" sound? From what I've read, while most like the Blackheart Little Giant, they are less than thrilled with the triode switch, some saying that it seems to robs the tone. Attenuator amps don't seem to suffer that same criticism. Hence my thought that you get better "bedroom" music with the AC4TV than the Night Train.
I never use the 3w triode setting on my BH head. In fact, I hate triode switches. They don't cut the volume that much and they always sound like there is a blanket over the amp. For my money attenuation is better. But attenuation has limits too. Too much and the amp sounds lifeless. A lot of the cranked tone that most players want to emulate is the amp pushing lots of power through speakers, which are moving a lot of air. You don't get this with attenuation.
piebaldpython said:
The AC4TV has a 10" Speaker which many seem to think is the "break-even" point for speaker size. If the Celestion is no good, just switch to a Rajin" Cajun as all of the Fender Super Champ XD owners just gush about.
I wish amp manufacturers would put at least a 10" speaker in all their amps. I've never heard a smaller speaker that I thought sounded good. Most of the 6" and 8" speakers are only there to save cost and make noise.
piebaldpython said:
Re speakers....as Andy said in another post....if it's strictly for "bedroom" playing, do you need stage quality speakers?? Isn't the idea just to make really nice music with something that is sized (wattage wise) for the room?
I think the worse the amp sounds, the less likely it is to be played. Having a good-sounding speaker is just as important to practice as it is to performing.
piebaldpython said:
My gut says that anything over 5 tube watts might be a bit large for a bedroom (unless you play Pro Sports and then your bedroom is larger than most of our houses :D ). If higher wattage tube amps could faithfully give "good" sound at LOW volumes, there wouldn't be a need for low watt amps and Attenuators, right?
5W in a small room is deafening when you crank it up.
piebaldpython said:
Also, if an amp has a headphone jack, that is a big help.
IMHO, the best headphone amps are the modeler/emulators, like the Digitech RP series. Headphones are basically hifi speakers, so unless there is frequency compensation circuitry built into the amp, the headphone out on a tube amp doesn't sound that good.
piebaldpython said:
My $02, but I think the AC4TV combo amp seems perfect for "bedroom" playing. The Night Train sounds great, but it's just a head and so you need a cab and it just goes on and on and on.
Serious GAS over in Philly for the AC4TV, Peavey Royal 8, Firefly and Little Lanilei (1/4 watt tube amp).
I'm a big fan of head amps. I have a couple of speaker cabs that I can plug my various heads into, and it works fine for me.
There are lots of cool, little, low watt amp right now. I'm glad manufacturers are jumping in the bandwagon.
tung