• You're one step from joining Guitar Discussion Forum - The Fret.
    Create a free account to post, follow threads, and never miss an update.  Sign up free →

How do you feel about "relic" guitars?

Guitar Discussion Forum - The Fret

Help Support TheFret.net:

Fab4

Well-known member
Joined
Nov 11, 2008
Messages
102
Reaction score
0
My local boutique guitar store - http://wildwoodguitars.com/new/ - does a booming business in brand new, high-end Fender and Gibson guitars that have been "relic-ed" to look old, worn and beat up. This all started when Fender wanted to reintroduce classic nitro finishes, but knew they'd be too fragile to hold up under warranty. So, they put nicks, dings, scratches and wear marks on them and sold them as "relics." Now, Fender offers NOS (New Old Stock, unaged, which I prefer) and Closet Classic variations.

I think the re-creation guitars, made to look and feel exactly like a star's main axe, are interesting. At least, you get some insight into how they've used and abused their favorite instrument. But the idea of buying a new guitar that has been made to look artificially old really bugs me.

With a "real" old guitar, you're buying the instrument's mojo and history. With a "relic" guitar, you're paying extra for what amounts to fake mojo, in my opinion. Personally, I want a new guitar to look new, then I can watch it take on a patina of age that reflects MY history with it. To that end, I paid an up-charge to Gibson to have them NOT age my custom-color Les Paul.

I realize there are some playability and sonic differences with, say, a worn in neck or aged pickups. But I also think there are more fraud possibilities, where an unsuspecting buyers pay top dollar for what they think are "real vintage" guitars.

But that's just me. Clearly a lot of high-end buyers disagree. Where do you stand?
 
I don't like anything that has been "fake-aged" - that goes for hats, jeans, and guitars.

To me that's like cutting your own face up becuase you like the look of scars.
 
I can't see paying extra..........
If you find a bargain on a neck/body/etc. that's been worn naturally, that's different.
 
Would never get one if they have a NOS option for the same model.

But let`s say I see someone selling a Relic Nocaster for 1.500,00US$ - I'd go for it all the way. After all, I dont think I could tell what dings are "real relic" from the "fake" ones.
 
Iago said:
I don't think I could tell what dings are "real relic" from the "fake" ones.

That's a good point. The owner of Wildwood Guitars told me once that relic guitars are great to have in the shop because they're immune to shop wear.

Another guitar shop in Denver (that has since gone out of business) used to be so anal about shop wear that they put sticky notes on the pickguards when you tried them out, they watched you like a hawk the whole time and then wiped every fingerprint off immediately when you put a guitar down. I always felt unclean when I went in there.

And don't even get me started on Ed Roman's "Don't Touch Until You Buy" policy at his store in Vegas....

For the record, Wildwood is GREAT about letting you try out any guitar for as long as you like.
 
I get the (hawk eye) feel in the music store here,so I do not go there much.Sumi:D I think I'll wear a straight jacket next time I go there and see how that goes over.
 
sumitomo said:
I get the (hawk eye) feel in the music store here,so I do not go there much.

I don't know why you'd want to make your customers feel ooky about shopping for something that's as personal as a guitar. One guitar can sound totally different than another one of the same model. How can you tell if a guitar "speaks" to you if you can't sit down and get to know it? Maybe all those store owners are big proponents of speed dating, too.
 
Katastrophe said:
I'm not a big fan of "factory relics." I'd rather relic my own over time...:D

My take, also.

I've never understood the entire relic craze - a brand new guitar factory dinged and abused for exponentially more money than the stock model...............or the players that have their's "professionally relic'ed" for big money. That's all well and good until I start hearing just how superior these "relics" are to the stock line.................perhaps the owner's trying to justify the ludicrous prices?

As a wise man once said "Put a few cigarette burns on a Strat, and you've just increased its value by $25,000". :thwap:
 
Fab4 said:
Another guitar shop in Denver (that has since gone out of business) used to be so anal about shop wear that they put sticky notes on the pickguards when you tried them out, they watched you like a hawk the whole time and then wiped every fingerprint off immediately when you put a guitar down. I always felt unclean when I went in there.

That`s pretty much how the stores are here. And don't even think about asking about it if you're a teenager without dad and his wallet there with you.

Fab4 said:
And don't even get me started on Ed Roman's "Don't Touch Until You Buy" policy at his store in Vegas....

For the record, Wildwood is GREAT about letting you try out any guitar for as long as you like.

HAhahaha this guy has some sense of humour, really! Though, I kinda like his rants.
I've heard good about Wildwood!
 
David Wilcox sort of has a song about all this, called "Guitar Shopping". When he has young, he says:

I needed something old and righteous
with its own authority
So the first guitar I ever bought
Was twice as old as me

But now lately I buy new guitars,
They're shiny as a hearse
I still like the look of road wear,
But the roles have been reversed

I turn 50 next week, so I guess bring my own road wear with me to every gig, too. Must be that creaking noise I hear when I bend my knees...
 
I think that many (not all ,but many) relic buyers are out to give an impression that they are long lost and battered road warrior musicians
just by the look of their guitar.what other purpose is there? it has nothing to do with playability..

Most of the instruments I have purchased in the years past were allready worn, I'm drawn to that worn out used instrument in the corner of the shop , it has some history behind it like an old hot rod or piece of furniture. it has honestly earned those scars over years of playing and getting knocked around.

I'm not drawn to the instant relic in any way.some look good but they are simply artificial.
 
Brian Krashpad said:

Same, other than I would take an excellent deal on a "reliced" guitar if I like the guitar, but would maybe pay less than a well worn guitar. Like I would not pay extra for "distressed" jeans, but would buy a good vintage pair from a surplus shop or second hand store.
 
Andy said:
I think that many (not all ,but many) relic buyers are out to give an impression that they are long lost and battered road warrior musicians
just by the look of their guitar.what other purpose is there? it has nothing to do with playability...

Agreed. To me it's pompous, preening, pretentious posing. "Look at my old road warrior guitar. It makes me look like I've been playing for 30 years...........even if I'm only 22".

But I don't really see too many working musicians using relics. They tend to do their own relic'ing. The collector, big dollar relics make me laugh. The only market they seem to be aimed at is the non playing yuppies..........but those guitars are never marketed with playing intended.

If a relic is yo thang, more power to you. Just don't show up at one of my gigs and tell me how much better your relic is compared to the newer guitars I'm playing. Factory installed dings and artificial road rash doesn't make for instant mojo.

Did I mention I'm not big on relics? :D

I'm off rant now..........................
 
I'm not a big fan of the fake relicing process either. Especially the fact that a professionally reliced guitar will cost much more than someone who reliced it the old fashioned way.

WRT shop owners being anal about their guitars, I don't blame them. I played an SRV Strat at a GC a while back that was new, but it had taken plenty of abuse just hanging there. Granted GC is a mega corporation and the help isn't paid to care. In a mom and pop shop, that's everything. I don't know what I'd do. I suppose with low-end foreign-made stuff its not a big deal, but if you get some U.S. made Fenders or Gibsons, etc., I'd be watching like a hawk.
 
marnold said:
In a mom and pop shop, that's everything. I don't know what I'd do. I suppose with low-end foreign-made stuff its not a big deal, but if you get some U.S. made Fenders or Gibsons, etc., I'd be watching like a hawk.

I suppose it depends on how fast your stock moves. Wildwood sells bazillions of guitars over the internet, so they move stuff out pretty fast. They're one of (if not the) largest Fender and Gibson dealers in the world...and certainly the largest independent dealer, although you'd never know it to walk into their store. The guitars at Mom & Pop Ltd. probably hang on the wall for weeks or months, giving them lots of time to develop a touch of the ol' relic.

Wildwood can probably be a little less anal because they cater to the experienced player and the fat wallet guy. The thrashers go to GC. Wildwood also understands the "getting to know you" process, which is key to selling the higher-end stuff. Still, they do ask that you let THEM get the guitars down off the wall...which seems like a reasonable move to me.
 
Plank_Spanker said:
Did I mention I'm not big on relics? :D

I'm off rant now..........................


Are you Suhr you don't like reliced geetars? Robert wanted to know. :D :poke:


I agree. If I'm going to pay the price of a new guitar, then I want it to LOOK like a new guitar! :AOK:
 
bigoldron said:
I agree. If I'm going to pay the price of a new guitar, then I want it to LOOK like a new guitar! :AOK:

That's what I was thinking!

As for music shops- my local shop is a Martin dealer but keeps all their Martin inventory way, way up high almost at ceiling height. Takes a ladder to get them down. I never feel encouraged to ask about trying one- I had to go out of town to do that. On one hand I understand it but on the other, it seems kind of pretentious to me.
 
peachhead said:
I never feel encouraged to ask about trying one- I had to go out of town to do that.

So, it seems like some of these stores are discouraging customers and thereby sacrificing potential sales to avoid shop wear. Of course, they want to avoid shop wear because it would cut into sales. Am I missing something here?

And if I put my G&L Legacy on a guitar stand behind my truck on a gravel road, hit the gas and sprayed the thing with rocks, would it be worth an extra $1500?

What if somebody made a guitar with a new finish but with a worn-in-feeling neck and aged pickups? I think I asked a Fender rep about that once. Would that have any appeal for anyone?
 
I have seen some very nice "relic-ed" guitars from this guy.
A local dealer has them and I tried them out. They are under 500 and they have Wilkinson pickups and hardware.
http://www.jhs.co.uk/vintageelectric.html
I would not pay 3000 or more for a brand new guitar. I have a tech who bought one from the custom shop and paid 3500. It looked like a 40 year old Strat. It even had a pot missing on purpose.
 
I would never want to imply that "modern relics" are bad guitars. Fender started doing them because they wanted to make true vintage clones with period-correct finishes, and they really upped the standards for that approach. The JHS Vintage Electrics look like good values, and I've played some great sounding relics from the Nash Guitars Time Warp series, which have Lollar pickups and sell in the $1700-$1900US range.

http://www.nashguitars.com/timewarp/index.html

For build quality, sound quality and practically, modern relics are some of the best guitars out there. Plus, if you want that look, you can get it on a great guitar that may have modern features like a flatter fingerboard radius, bigger frets and modern wiring. The Wildwood 10 series is like that, and so are the Nash Time Warps.

My beef with relics is strictly philosophical and cosmetic. I don't want to feel like I'm living a lie, plus I love the process of getting a new guitar and watching it "relic" naturally.

(The next step: The Spongebob Relic Series! Coooooal!)
 
Fab4 said:
That's a good point. The owner of Wildwood Guitars told me once that relic guitars are great to have in the shop because they're immune to shop wear.

What? Like they dont have to care for them anymore???
Like its okay if a customer does something stupid, like banging one into another when putting it back on the hook?

I cant say that Id be a fan of paying 1k+ for a relic...but that Joe Strummer is pretty damn affordable and has some nice wear patterns and that rusty corrosion looks pretty sweet! If you havent picked one up...you should check one out!:AOK:

PS I really like my "beat all to hell" MIJ Strat....looks like it was left in a car several times...the thin urethane is cracked and chipped, chunks of clear coming off the fretboard and the natural wood under darkening, bridge patina and corroded bolts and hardware...all for $100!
I think Im more of a "used" guy than a "relic" guy...but if they could make a new one with that used feel and still make it affordable(like the Joe Strummer) Id be all over it!
 
I'm not really into the whole buy a new pre-reliced guitar - even a tribute one.

I like the fact that the new Fender David Gilmour Black Strat is available either as a NOS or a Relic - if I could afford it, I'd buy the NOS one.

I've picked up and inspected some of the Closet Classics - very nice - but they aren't my idea of a new guitar - I want a guitar to look and feel and sound new.

Just my 2 cents :D

Gil :cool:
 
Gil Janus said:
I like the fact that the new Fender David Gilmour Black Strat is available either as a NOS or a Relic - if I could afford it, I'd buy the NOS one.

But isnt the David Gilmore a Black on Burst???
A finish like that kinda begs to be relic'd...although I think Im more of a fan of replicas.
 
Back
Top