sunvalleylaw
Contributing Member
I agree with the other PNW'ers that somewhere between Olympia and Seattle is good to check out. All of I-5 in that area is a bit of a sprawl, and cost of living varies with the housing costs of the neighborhoods. Personally, I think my old town of Tacoma and surrounds is worth a look, as it has a lot of the benefits of Seattle now, but houses are a lot cheaper. Seattle is close enough when you want to go there. It is rainy much of the winter into june sometimes. Summer, what there is of it, can be beautiful. Bellingham/Fairhaven is another place I would check out if I was moving to the PNW. Also the Dalles/Hood River area east of Portland. On the Columbia, lots of water and recreation, small towns again. I do like Portland a lot too.
One thing you should know when you look at Washington and Oregon, west of the Cascades is generally very green and wet. I-5 runs up and down that area and strings all the cities together from Vancouver BC in Canada down through Seatle/Tacoma/Olympia/Portland/Salem/Eugene, etc. Left some out but you get the idea. East of the cascades in both OR and WA is mostly agricultural, with much less rain, fewer trees, etc. The Palouse. Then you get closer to the rockies in Idaho, Montana, etc. and you are in the intermountain regions.
I moved over here because I wanted to be in the mountains and thought I could carve out a niche. It is a small area and you have to be able to find a way to make a living in a small resort community. The building industry that supported more people has gone bust here like most places. Boise is another bigger town that is worth a look though. Has a university, good weather, decent cost of living, good recreation, etc. More high desert and less rain than west of the cascades. A touch hot for me in Boise, but it is a nice town.
I know nothing really about the mid-west. If I was over there, I think I would want to be up near all the lakes. But like I said, I really don't know much about that area.
This is the sort of thing that makes me suggest closer to Tacoma/Olympia areas rather than Seattle metro area. You definitely pay a premium to live in and around Seattle proper.
One thing you should know when you look at Washington and Oregon, west of the Cascades is generally very green and wet. I-5 runs up and down that area and strings all the cities together from Vancouver BC in Canada down through Seatle/Tacoma/Olympia/Portland/Salem/Eugene, etc. Left some out but you get the idea. East of the cascades in both OR and WA is mostly agricultural, with much less rain, fewer trees, etc. The Palouse. Then you get closer to the rockies in Idaho, Montana, etc. and you are in the intermountain regions.
I moved over here because I wanted to be in the mountains and thought I could carve out a niche. It is a small area and you have to be able to find a way to make a living in a small resort community. The building industry that supported more people has gone bust here like most places. Boise is another bigger town that is worth a look though. Has a university, good weather, decent cost of living, good recreation, etc. More high desert and less rain than west of the cascades. A touch hot for me in Boise, but it is a nice town.
I know nothing really about the mid-west. If I was over there, I think I would want to be up near all the lakes. But like I said, I really don't know much about that area.
I think my contention with that idea is that I believe prices are inflated here because it's a big metropolitan area, and it's sort of the "tax" you pay for being able to live here.
This is the sort of thing that makes me suggest closer to Tacoma/Olympia areas rather than Seattle metro area. You definitely pay a premium to live in and around Seattle proper.