• You're one step from joining Guitar Discussion Forum - The Fret.
    Create a free account to post, follow threads, and never miss an update.  Sign up free →

NFL 2009 - All in One?

Guitar Discussion Forum - The Fret

Help Support TheFret.net:

R_of_G said:
Revis was a no-brainer.
There were 13 teams that picked ahead of the Jets. Looking at the list, I'd say only calvin johnson, joe thomas, purple jesus, and patrick willis are ones I would take above him, and that's not even a sure thing.

I look at the draft largely as a crapshoot. Some decisions seem like guaranteed success and then turn out to be busts. Hindsight is 20/20, but did anyone honestly think Charles Rogers was going to be as bad as he was? Wasn't Plaxico supposed to be a bust-in-waiting? While he has had issues, he's been productive overall.

So maybe Gholston was a bad pick. Maybe Ferguson was questionable. There have been good picks too like Revis, Mangold, Washington, Cotchery, David Harris, etc. I think those players are viewed positively, but I don't watch the Jets much.

I suppose what I'm saying is that no team bats 1.000, so be happy that you have some players who have stuck. I grew up in Minnesota, and no matter how many CBs they drafted, they all stunk. It's possible not to get any good players in the draft.

R_of_G said:
When there isn't an obvious pick, I am a big proponent of trading down to get more picks.
You should have been here when the Eagles traded down and Dallas drafted Anthony Spencer. You would have thought the world exploded. "When there isn't an obvious pick" is a completely subjective statement, as is the decision to trade down. I just don't think it's that simple.

R_of_G said:
I have no idea where that comes from. The players seem to love him. The fans sure love him. He gave Jets fans what we have wanted since the days of the New York Sack Exchange, a dominating defense. It is not Ryan's fault that Brian Schottenheimer calls the same offensive plays every single game no matter the situation or the opponent.
It's all of his pompous trash-talking to players and coaches. He seems to be this arrogant jerk. The defense is very good this year, which may be due to Rex Ryan.

Maybe you can help me out, since I was about to say I don't know -- does Tannenbaum control who the coordinators are? I know it sometimes works out that the head coach has to do battle with the ownership/front office as to who calls the offense/defense (Redskins are a good example of this). If that's how it is with the Jets, then yeah, Tannenbaum deserves a bit more blame for having a predictable offense.

As far as that possibly being intentional, bear in mind a couple of things:
1) They have a rookie quarterback who has the potential to throw tons of picks. They may be right to keep it simple for him.
2) Different teams do the matchup thing differently. I know in the late 90s, Denver was a big-time matchup team, where they'd exploit things in other teams. The mid-90s Packers, not so much; they'd just do their thing and force the defense to adapt, which usually resulted in GB winning. It's a philosophy, and both have the potential to work.

Rex Ryan does not strike me as someone who, when faced with a lack of power, would approach it in a mature manner and try to make it work. Just from outward appearances, he seems like sort who would be a jerk until he gets his way. Is it Tannenbaum's fault for hiring someone not willing to work with him as the GM? Absolutely. So maybe it does fall on him, but for different reasons.
 
Eric said:
There were 13 teams that picked ahead of the Jets. Looking at the list, I'd say only calvin johnson, joe thomas, purple jesus, and patrick willis are ones I would take above him, and that's not even a sure thing.

I look at the draft largely as a crapshoot. Some decisions seem like guaranteed success and then turn out to be busts. Hindsight is 20/20, but did anyone honestly think Charles Rogers was going to be as bad as he was? Wasn't Plaxico supposed to be a bust-in-waiting? While he has had issues, he's been productive overall.

So maybe Gholston was a bad pick. Maybe Ferguson was questionable. There have been good picks too like Revis, Mangold, Washington, Cotchery, David Harris, etc. I think those players are viewed positively, but I don't watch the Jets much.

I suppose what I'm saying is that no team bats 1.000, so be happy that you have some players who have stuck. I grew up in Minnesota, and no matter how many CBs they drafted, they all stunk. It's possible not to get any good players in the draft.

I agree with you about all that. Revis is the kind of player who comes along once every ten years where it is obvious that barring injury, he's going to excel in the league.

That is pretty much what I mean about trading down. By "obvious pick" I pretty much mean someone who is a relatively safe bet for first round money. I will concede that this is subjective, but with certain players like Darrelle Revis, when there isn't a single negative scouting report, it's relatively safe as opposed to using the #6 pick on Gholston about whom the best reports said something to the effect of "he's a physical fitness freak who may be able to be converted into a football player."

To trade that #6 pick to another team for a later first round pick and maybe a second or third would allow us to bring in two guys that are not high first rounders and thus have to work for their jobs rather than expecting it to be handed to them. It's a matter of playing the odds. If I can draft 5 guys or 9 guys I will take the 9 guys thinking the competition for the jobs will be stronger. Afterall, we all know by now that late round guys can be just a productive (if not more so) than the first rounders (Tom Brady being the most obvious example).

The other problem is that Tannenbaum is often "extremely careful with money," and that's why even though he was smart enough to draft Washington, we will now lose Washington. Leon was the single most dangerous offensive threat in the league in 2008 and was paid the league minimum. The time to address this was over the off-season. Instead, Tannenbaum ignored it, hoping it would go away. Now this year comes along, Leon has the decency to not hold out for long, and comes to play assuming he will get the money he deserves. And note, Leon was not asking for top-pick money, just more than he was getting which he surely deserved. Instead, he breaks his leg while still under this pitiful contract. I am pretty sure he will be a free agent after this year and if so, why would he come back to the Jets when other teams will be more than happy to pay him what he's worth? This Tannenbaum mistake will have consequences. Leon was the answer for third down conversions and would have made Sanchez's life much much easier.

Eric said:
It's all of his pompous trash-talking to players and coaches. He seems to be this arrogant jerk. The defense is very good this year, which may be due to Rex Ryan.

Well, he is Buddy Ryan's kid so a certain level of arrogance is to be expected, no? Honestly, that's what I love about him and why I was praying the Jets would sign him as their coach. I want a coach that thinks his team should win every single game.

And all credit for the change in defense goes to Ryan. These are his schemes and his game plans and his in-game adjustments. Basically, everything he did in Baltimore for ten years he brought to the Jets and the players took to it in about four weeks. Once they bought in, the opposition stopped scoring.

I'd say they're a bit better than "very good." They lead the league in least points allowed and least passing yards allowed. The only defensive stat in which they aren't number one is rushing yards allowed and that has a lot to do with losing NT Kris Jenkins for the season to injury. Even so, they are still in the top 10 in run defense.

Eric said:
Maybe you can help me out, since I was about to say I don't know -- does Tannenbaum control who the coordinators are? I know it sometimes works out that the head coach has to do battle with the ownership/front office as to who calls the offense/defense (Redskins are a good example of this). If that's how it is with the Jets, then yeah, Tannenbaum deserves a bit more blame for having a predictable offense.

It's my understanding that Tannenbaum is in charge of the coordinator staff. I think Rex had input, but ultimately Tannenbaum has the final say, which is why Schottenheimer was held over for this year.

Eric said:
As far as that possibly being intentional, bear in mind a couple of things:
1) They have a rookie quarterback who has the potential to throw tons of picks. They may be right to keep it simple for him.
2) Different teams do the matchup thing differently. I know in the late 90s, Denver was a big-time matchup team, where they'd exploit things in other teams. The mid-90s Packers, not so much; they'd just do their thing and force the defense to adapt, which usually resulted in GB winning. It's a philosophy, and both have the potential to work.

I'm all for keeping the offense simple to help Sanchez learn the ropes and not put too much pressure on him. This sunday will be his 15th pro game, only one short of the number of starts he made at USC, so I know he's got a long way to go.

That said, when blocking schemes for the run don't work week in and week out, it's time to try different plays. If they didn't work last year, and the offensive line is the same five guys, it won't work this year either.

The other thing that gets me about Schottenheimer is his insistence on calling passing plays of inadequate yardage on third down. For example, if it's third and seven, they will throw a five or six yard pass. If the receiver catches is and gets hit immediately, what was the point? Why not go seven yards so if he catches it he already has the conversion?

He also calls a lot of passing plays on third and short. We have the number one ranked rushing attack in the NFL and a power back like Thomas Jones. On third and two I feel a lot safer giving it to Jones than giving it to Sanchez hoping he finds a receiver and said receiver makes the catch.

Eric said:
Rex Ryan does not strike me as someone who, when faced with a lack of power, would approach it in a mature manner and try to make it work. Just from outward appearances, he seems like sort who would be a jerk until he gets his way. Is it Tannenbaum's fault for hiring someone not willing to work with him as the GM? Absolutely. So maybe it does fall on him, but for different reasons.

I actually think Rex is doing an admirable job in his first season as head coach. He's made some mistakes and he hasn't repeated them, so he can learn which is good. When the Jets blew some games they should have won (particularly the second Miami game) he took all the blame (which was clearly not his to take as that loss was entirely the fault of the special teams coach for twice kicking off to Tedd Ginn instead of squibbing the second kick). In general, it seems like Rex instilled in the Jets that Ryan attitude that this team should win every single game. That's a far cry from where we were with Mangini who seems to just not care.

I don't think there's any tension between he and Tannenbaum. I just think the Jets would be better served to give Ryan more of a say in personnel decisions. He seems to know what he's doing. He developed a defense that allowed Baltimore to win a game with Trent Dilfer at QB. I live in Tampa so I know Dilfer's limitations. If a Ryan defense can win a Super Bowl with him at QB, surely Rex can work up something to benefit Sanchez.

All I know is that in his first year, with a rookie at QB and a brand new defensive scheme, he has this team in control of their own playoff destiny. Hard to ask much more of a first year head coach.
 
Oh man. I suppose I could respond to all of this, but it would just be arguing to get the last word in, and these posts seem to be getting longer every time.

I suppose I'm glad you like Rex Ryan. One correction, however: I don't think he was defensive coordinator for all of those years. A few names that come to mind are Marvin Lewis, Mike Nolan, and possibly Jack Del Rio, but Del Rio may have been linebackers coach. Point being, I think Ryan was only DC for a few years there at most, and definitely not during the Superbowl year.
 
You're correct, Ryan was the defensive line coach in 2000 when the Ravens won the Super Bowl. He did have a huge hand in developing the defensive scheme that led to the championship, but you're right, Nolan was the coordinator at the time.
 
R_of_G said:
You're correct, Ryan was the defensive line coach in 2000 when the Ravens won the Super Bowl. He did have a huge hand in developing the defensive scheme that led to the championship, but you're right, Nolan was the coordinator at the time.
I'm pretty sure it was Marvin Lewis that was the coordinator, but you're right about Ryan being the d-line coach.
 
Eric said:
I'm pretty sure it was Marvin Lewis that was the coordinator, but you're right about Ryan being the d-line coach.

Right again, I was off by a year. Nolan went to Baltimore in 2001. Actually, he was the Jets' DC in 2000.
 
Our long nightmare is over. Another Lions' season concludes with a thud. According to ESPN Detroit will have the #2 pick and at least a shot at Suh. In case you think your team is bad, check out the sidebar on this Detroit Free Press article. They're not just bad; they've been historically bad. As in "no one's ever been worse than this" bad. Sigh.
 
marnold said:
...Detroit will have the #2 pick and at least a shot at Suh.

glad to see you are thinking of that side of the ball this time. not that stafford didn't show potential this year but a defensive tackle like suh comes along once every 15 years or so (the last was sapp and he dominated in his time). i can see it happening too because st. louis needs a qb so that will likely be bradford leaving suh right there for the lions to take. i hope it works out for you, but if not, i'd love to see him in a bucs uniform.
 
R_of_G said:
glad to see you are thinking of that side of the ball this time. not that stafford didn't show potential this year but a defensive tackle like suh comes along once every 15 years or so (the last was sapp and he dominated in his time). i can see it happening too because st. louis needs a qb so that will likely be bradford leaving suh right there for the lions to take. i hope it works out for you, but if not, i'd love to see him in a bucs uniform.
If Suh gets past St. Louis and Detroit doesn't draft him, I'm personally going to drive to Allen Park and run everyone over with my '95 Oldsmobile. The good thing is that there are a couple of good D lineman at the top of the draft. I haven't heard any word on whom the Lions are considering, but if Suh is there at #2 they'd be insane not to take him. He is a one man wrecking crew.
 
marnold said:
In case you think your team is bad, check out the sidebar on this Detroit Free Press article. They're not just bad; they've been historically bad. As in "no one's ever been worse than this" bad. Sigh.
If memory serves, the Phillies were bestowed with a similar honor a few years (not sure how many...it could have been 10 or so) before they won the World Series, so chin up.
 
Childbride said:
go cowboys
Meh. I have this convenient relationship with Philadelphia sports, in that I'm from Minnesota originally, so I take the position of casual observer more often than not. I use my homeland of MN to justify being a somewhat-detached bandwagon jumper who can enjoy the ride if they're doing well.

I was pretty amused by today's outcome. Sports radio should be a-buzzin' tomorrow...
 
marnold said:
If Suh gets past St. Louis and Detroit doesn't draft him, I'm personally going to drive to Allen Park and run everyone over with my '95 Oldsmobile. The good thing is that there are a couple of good D lineman at the top of the draft. I haven't heard any word on whom the Lions are considering, but if Suh is there at #2 they'd be insane not to take him. He is a one man wrecking crew.

Not sure if he's going to declare yet, but my USF Bulls have a junior named Jason Pierre-Paul who is the #2 rated DE should he come out this year. He is a pass-rushing machine.

And now, on to the main event for tonight...

You guys that know me know what's coming now...

J-E-T-S
Jets!
Jets!
Jets!


For a defense-obsessed football fan like me, tonight was a real treat. This is why I was asking for Rex Ryan as a coach. This is why I was ecstatic when the Jets drafted Darrelle Revis out of Pitt three years ago.

Next week should be interesting when we have to replay the Bengals in their stadium with all their starters and their real game plan, but if the Jets show up like they did tonight, the Bengals will have their hands full.

All I can say right now is that with a rookie head coach and a rookie QB we made the playoffs and I couldn't be happier with the way the future looks for this team.
 
Eric said:
Meh. I have this convenient relationship with Philadelphia sports, in that I'm from Minnesota originally, so I take the position of casual observer more often than not. I use my homeland of MN to justify being a somewhat-detached bandwagon jumper who can enjoy the ride if they're doing well.

I was pretty amused by today's outcome. Sports radio should be a-buzzin' tomorrow...


You listen up Eric.....Mr. Minnesota Transplant........Today's game against the Cowboys was like Ned Beatty in Deliverance......we were schtupped and humiliated beyond belief. Shut out. Painful to watch and we get them next week and truth be told, I pray that we put up a better fight next week. Another blow-out wouldn't surprise me. That being said...maybe today's disaster will properly motivate the Iggles to come out snarling and pounding.

Should be interesting to see how Vegas sets the odds for the game. I have to think the Cowboys will be favored.

Born and raised in Philly....I bleed Phillies Red, Iggles Green and Flyers Orange
 
piebaldpython said:
You listen up Eric.....Mr. Minnesota Transplant........Today's game against the Cowboys was like Ned Beatty in Deliverance......we were schtupped and humiliated beyond belief. Shut out. Painful to watch and we get them next week and truth be told, I pray that we put up a better fight next week. Another blow-out wouldn't surprise me. That being said...maybe today's disaster will properly motivate the Iggles to come out snarling and pounding.

Should be interesting to see how Vegas sets the odds for the game. I have to think the Cowboys will be favored.

Born and raised in Philly....I bleed Phillies Red, Iggles Green and Flyers Orange
Interesting...the one team I would call my own is the Sixers, who are sucking big-time this year.

I think the 'boys are -4 next week, which is a guaranteed Eagles win in my book. It's easy for me to say, but I kind of figured this might happen today, though I thought they'd at least make a game of it. I thought the Jackson loss at center would be a bigger deal than it was.
 
After a night's sleep.....I'm now gonna take the position that the IGGLES played possum.....kind of a football version of ALI's "rope-a-dope" that he used against George Foreman. :what
 
piebaldpython said:
After a night's sleep.....I'm now gonna take the position that the IGGLES played possum.....kind of a football version of ALI's "rope-a-dope" that he used against George Foreman. :what
Hmm. Maybe that means my Lions have been playing possum . . . since 1962.
 
marnold said:
Hmm. Maybe that means my Lions have been playing possum . . . since 1962.

they've got the rest of the league right where they want them, now they're set to pounce!!!!

oh, and 19 months isn't too early to get the next generation into the family tradition, right?

EllaRoseJets.jpg
 
My little girl has a Lions cheerleader outfit. She really likes wearing it. I often wonder why I'm so cruel to my children as to encourage them to be Lions fans.
 
If the ESPN NFC North blogger is to be believed, the Jets will be visiting Ford Field next season. You can begin planning the victory parade now. At least it appears that the Lions' toughest opponents will be coming to Detroit. I wonder which one will be on Thanksgiving?
 
marnold said:
If the ESPN NFC North blogger is to be believed, the Jets will be visiting Ford Field next season. You can begin planning the victory parade now. At least it appears that the Lions' toughest opponents will be coming to Detroit. I wonder which one will be on Thanksgiving?

I know this is a new era under Coach Ryan and I am on board and all, but one thing I've learned in my life as a Jets fan is to never underestimate their ability to play down to the level of their competition. I'd love to see the Jets as the Thanksgiving game as I rarely get to see them on tv here in Tampa so any national games would be nice.
 
R_of_G said:
I know this is a new era under Coach Ryan and I am on board and all, but one thing I've learned in my life as a Jets fan is to never underestimate their ability to play down to the level of their competition.
Interesting point there -- do you think there is such a thing as a team really having a way of playing, aside from one particular era of core players?

My time in Philadelphia has fallen entirely under the Reid/McNabb regime, so it's not the best example, but more than anything, I would say that the Eagles have had teams capable of laying incredible beatdowns on opponents, but they are maddeningly inconsistent. Some weeks McNabb seems to love throwing into the dirt, other weeks he's freaking Peyton Manning with wheels. They don't play down to their competition, but the any-given-Sunday thing is always true with the Eagles -- you never know what you will get from week to week.

So the question is whether there is such a thing as themes that certain teams seem destined to hold forever. Seems like it's possible, but was wondering what you guys think.
 
Eric said:
So the question is whether there is such a thing as themes that certain teams seem destined to hold forever. Seems like it's possible, but was wondering what you guys think.

I think it's really a matter of our perceptions. You nailed it when you used the word inconsistent. The less consistency a team has, the more easy it is to superimpose patterns on their play.

I do think in some cases, like often playing poorly against teams that are less talented, it is possible to chalk it up to coaches not getting a team up for a game but not in every case for sure.
 
Last edited:
My team has been remarkably consistent. Since William Clay Ford bought the franchise en toto, they've won one playoff game. One. Mind you, he took over a team that was a powerhouse in the 50s.
 
Back
Top